‘The Dionysia’ (Bedlam: 20 February ’14)

1964877_10153821418800346_1434992075_n (1)

“The most important decision taken was that a portion of points would be awarded for how each show represented the style of the producing society.”

Editorial Rating: Nae Bad

They never had anything like this in my day. As EUSA’s last non-sabbatical Societies Convenor I would loudly lament the lack of inter-Society activities. I didn’t do anything about it, that’s not the point of student politics, but I did passionately (and lengthily) express my views at SRC meetings.

“Don’t worry about it Dan,” replied my colleagues. “Next year some guys at Harvard are going to invent a thing called ‘social media’ and when that comes online it’ll be easy for students from across the university to come together and make magic happen.”

The first Dionysia Festival held, as part of Innovative Learning Week (they didn’t have that in my day either), at Bedlam brought together four student societies in a friendly competition. Inspired by the Athenian original, Bedlam’s Dionysia focused a wealth of creative effort on new writing, innovative staging and classical and contemporary interpretations of ancient dramas.

At 1pm archons and epimeletai from each of the competing societies, as well as two outside judges (yours truly among them), gathered in the cafe at Bedlam to set the ground rules. The most important decision taken was that a portion of points would be awarded for how each show represented the style of the producing society.

When the uninitiated attend Freshers’ Fairs they are presented with a flow chart to identify the raison d’etre of the various dramatic groups at Edinburgh. If you want to put on a puppet show – and have some experience – go to the University Theatre Society (Bedlam). If you want to put on a puppet show about Oedipus – go to Classics. If you’ve never put on a puppet show before but want to try – go to Relief. If you want to put on a puppet show as you throw ducks off a rooftop, whilst covered in white paint, rolling around on the floor and crying – go to Paradok.

Hats off to the day’s agonothetai, the game organizers. James Beagon, Rachel Bussom and Sophie Harris delivered a brilliant lineup showcasing the University’s established and emerging thespian, technical, artistic and musical talent.


Bedlam kicked off proceedings with a new script inspired by the part of King Creon in Sophocles’s Antigone. An isolated, hesitant ruler presides over an apocalyptic landscape devastated by a civil war in which the fallout from WMD has literally and figuratively disfigured the country.

Creon’s niece, Antigone, the daughter of Oedipus by his own mother Jocasta, is betrothed to Creon’s son Haemon. In order to ensure her warring brothers a proper burial, Antigone defies the prohibition against entering the fallout zone. Creon is faced with a dilemma that will test his leadership to breaking point.

First time writer Thomas Ware’s bold script demonstrates a wealth of subtle insight and profound musing on the original. The architecture is monumental but the necessary engineering is absent. In parts the weight presses down on the actors and it isn’t long before cracks begin emerging. There is little let up for Matthias Vollhardt as Creon as he shifts back and forth between intimate family moments and the hard-headed affairs of state. He seems to have fun shouting “Hail Thebes!” though.

Greek tragedy is underpinned by the notion that from small things come great and tragic things. Ware takes the opposite approach and, like a pyramid build upside down, it is only a matter of time before the tipping point.

There are minor issues: why is there an Archbishop in a polytheistic society? Is a city-state big enough to have a nuclear civil war? Why does Vollhardt wear his totalitarian armband on the right arm when others wear it on the left? Why is the recorded voice of one character performed by a different actor from the one on stage? Why hasn’t the chorus been given a device to cover her verbatim reading of her lines? Why does Chancellor Creon use his mobile phone to make an ever-so secret plan?

But there is a deeper question, and it isn’t that perennial A-Level exam essay: ‘Should Antigone be titled Creon?’ The script sails into murky waters in its treatment of Antigone. Ware presents her as deserving to be punished, wanting to be punished, it’s all her fault. Beagon and I both found something fascinating about our shoelaces as our fellow judges vented their annoyance. But then fleets of more experienced writers have also broken on the rocks of Athenian misogyny.


The Eumenides, performed by The Classical Society, followed the pursuit of Orestes by the vengeful Furies, avengers of matricides and patricides. Orestes killed his mother Clytemnestra for having murdered his father Agamemnon. Although he did so with the blessing of Apollo, the Furies hunt him down to a shrine of Athena. The great goddess presides over a trial at which the argument is put forward that in marriage men are more important that women. Having been immaculately conceived without a mother, exploding from the head of Zeus, Athena is open to this line of argument.

This is a big performance with the tone being set early on by a delphic Christina M. Intrator as Apollo’s oracle. The contrast with what preceded is rather like stepping back from an Adam Elsheimer canvas to discover it’s been hung on Mount Rushmore. The dust is shaken up by a trio troupe of drummers who drive pace into the heart of everything happening on stage.

The Furies (Tamsyn Lonsdale-Smith, Susan Kidd and Tara McKeaney) are fearsome, I’m shaking, my teeth are chattering and not just because of Bedlam’s supernatural ability to be colder inside than it is on the street. They weren’t totally in sync but this adds to the terrifying sense that three individuals are totally combined to one end. What they were was what William-Adolphe Bouguereau was driving at.

Frances Heatherington made up for a slightly grating lack of other props and theatrical formatting with a set of artistic, artful masks. I distrust masks. In the wrong hands they become a substitute for acting rather than a flavour enhancer. Not so here. They are simply wonderful and wonderfully deployed: enigmatic while engaging so as to highlight a script rainbowed with shades of grey.

Mia Allen and Tab Machin presented a swirling medley of script and sound, painted with an infinite lightness of touch. Strong performances by Ella Atterton and Eleanor Affleck completed a hard working, effective ensemble.


Paradok’s take on Medea, the story of a jilted wife’s refusal to play the victim, was most ambitious. There was much more acting, accents, set, costumes and even puppetry. There was also more formatting and features, some more necessary and accomplished than others.

The most successful of all was the chorus, three tightly choreographed figures shimmering in and out of the action. In white face paint (the Paradok signature) and white suits they were everything a dyed-in-the-wool Classicist could desire. Incidentally, Paradok founder Anya Bowman went on to found that insightful compendium of ancient wisdom for modern minds ClassicalWisdom.com.

From the start it was a Goldilocks ensemble, cast across a spectrum of dramatic impact. Joanna Pidcock as the nurse skirts the outer edges of Father Ted’s Mrs. Doyle. In a less straight-laced production something could have been made of that.

Similarly, Isabel Palmstierna as Medea, sounds out the pitch black comic possibilities – for the first time watching this play I am made to fully understand why men are fascinated by Medea’s mind as well as her ferocious, biting wit. Regrettably, this potential went untapped. The line between tragedy and comedy was fussily preserved.

After a strong start Olivier Huband’s momentum as Jason was soon spent. No less so than Medea, Jason is a part offering limitless avenues of interpretation. Huband played it safe. He portrayed neither a sensualist, opportunist, honest fool, malign social climber, nor a moral coward. If stage presence was all that was needed he’d have delivered the goods. He wasn’t bowled out by Palmstierna but neither did he find his sweet spot as she sent challenging pitch after challenging pitch hurtling towards the crease.

This was a production plagued with technical difficulties. The projector didn’t work (and when it finally did I wished it hadn’t). There were lighting failures, missed lines and what is worse an over-enthusiastic prompt.

But the positives outweighed the negatives. With more rehearsals and closer attention to the possibilities of the script, this production would have swung through the nervous nineties and scored a century.


Keep It Up Sisyphus! was a much needed break in the tension. This comic concoction chronicled the misadventures of a London wide-boy, who might have been the love child of Del Trotter and Harry Lime. It was set in an Allo! Allo! period French bar owned by Sisyphus’ long-suffering fiancee.

If not exactly a Classical script as such, James W. Woë and Andrew Blair’s play was a vehicle for creative minds doing what they do best. David Bard in the title role romped about the place, not letting the war get under his skin and keeping his masses of hair on. Carrying no small amount of sparkle himself, he also Seinfelded the situation so as to allow his fellow players to shine out too.

Rebecca Speedie as his laconic better half, with Nuri Corser and Imy Wyatt Corner as the resistance fighters, managed to set the scene and hold it under an onslaught of pacy absurdity. The set was perfect and perfectly used. A bar, a table, some chairs and a curtain – simple but effective.

Someone once described Rory Kelly as the Robbie Coltrane of our time, and they were right. As Greek Chorus he delivered an Izzard-esque stream of absurdity in a flat, deadpan that had the audience howling with laughter. Like one of those new compact deodorant bottles, Eric Geistfeld, as the villainous General Nichteinnettermann, squeezed every cubic centimetre of funny from The Producers into his short, snappy scenes.

It takes discipline to be this off beat, rehearsal to be this spontaneous and trust to be this individual.

I had a few minor gripes: would it have killed them to put some cold tea in the Jack Daniels bottle and couldn’t Sisyphus have tied his boot laces for a trek across Europe rather than a night on the tiles? But this was a show that knew what it was about, even if it wasn’t exactly about classical Greek theatre.


This was the first Dionysia Festival, organised as a platform to showcase the multifaceted talents of the student body. Funding was provided by Innovative Learning Week, but the true value was seeing just how bright are the bright young things from whom we can expect more fine work in the not-too-distant future.



THE AWARDS

Best Techie – Marina Johnson (Kreon)
Best Actor – Eric Geistfeld (Sisyphus)
Best Actress – Isabel Palmstierna (Medea)
Best Chorus Leader – Tamsyn Lonsdale-Smith (The Eumenides)

Best Chorus – Medea (Paradok)
Best Other Chorus – Sisyphus (Relief)
Best Design – Eumenides (Classics)
Best Tech – Kreon (Bedlam/EUTC)

Runners Up – Medea (Paradok)
Winners – The Eumenides (Classics)


nae bad_blue

Reviewer: Dan Lentell (Seen 20 February)

Visit The Dionysia homepage here.

Dial M For Murder (King’s Theatre: 18 – 22 Feb ’14)

Dial M For Murder

Photo: Manuel Harlan

“Everything about the production is carefully crafted to cast you back to a bygone age.”

Editorial Rating: Nae Bad

Here’s a piece of trivia you might not know: before it got the Hitchcock treatment, Dial M For Murder was already a popular West End play.  This elegant revival is keenly aware of that heritage, displaying an impressive attention to detail as it recreates the story’s post-war milieu.  Everything about the production – furniture, costumes, sounds – is carefully crafted to cast you back to a bygone age: a time when phones made funny clicking noises, men sank brandies before hopping in their cars, and everybody wore their waistbands astonishingly high.

The script’s distinctly old-fashioned too, especially in the opening scene, where the characters plonk themselves down on sofas to reminisce about the back-story.  But Mike Britton’s striking set design lends the production some stripped-down modern flair: an iconic bright-red telephone is matched by a looming bright-red curtain, behind which the titular murderer duly hides.  Hanging from a circular rail, the curtain creepily rotates all round the set – a constant reminder of the blood that’s been shed, and of one particular character’s all-too-obvious guilt.

The stage rotates as well – a creative approach to what could have been a very static play, though the overall effect is sometimes more disorientating than it is disturbing.  A few shifts in tone are confusing too: the protracted murder scene feels wilfully overblown, in curious contrast to the generally slow-burning mood.  But there can be no reservations about Mic Pool’s eerie soundscape, whose portentous jazz riffs have the power to make even an empty room utterly enthralling.

Christopher Timothy – well-known for his TV roles – offers a reassuring presence in the form of Inspector Hubbard, melding the homely normality you might find in Midsomer Murders with an unexpected hard-nosed urgency in the later scenes.  The role doesn’t offer him many opportunities to stand out, but it’s a finely-nuanced performance which does much to anchor the rest of the play.  The acting honours, however, truly belong to Daniel Betts, whose villainous Tony Wendice is a masterpiece of smooth malevolence.  Betts’ performance is as sleek and oily as his swept-back, Brylcreemed hair.

If the truth be told, Frederick Knott’s 60-year-old script isn’t quite as masterful as you might have been expecting, and a few of its crucial plot points defy rational analysis.  But as long as you don’t think too hard about it, you’ll find this a comfortingly faithful production – which is slow out of the starting blocks, but accelerates smoothly towards an exciting, brain-teasing conclusion.  It may not be Hitchcock, but it’s a good solid play.  Dial K for King’s and book your ticket now.

nae bad_blue

Reviewer: Richard Stamp (Seen 18 February)

Find information and book tickets here.

‘Private Lives’ (Lyceum: 14 Feb – 8 March ’14)

John Hopkins as Elyot Chase and Kirsty Besterman as Amanda Prynne by Tommy Ga -Ken Wan

John Hopkins as Elyot Chase and Kirsty Besterman as Amanda Prynne by Tommy Ga -Ken Wan

“This production is highly quaffable, bubbly and intoxicating. It’s not vintage stuff but it’s as near as makes no odds.”

Editorial Rating: Nae Bad

It’s the age old story told time and again down the ages. First boy meets first girl, falls in love and, three years laters, falls back out of love. Five years later first boy and first girl have remarried to second girl and second boy respectively. But, horror of horrors, all four find themselves sharing neighbouring honeymoon suites in a French hotel. And so first boy and first girl are forced to realize that only in the most awkward of situations can their tempestuous love be sustained.

First produced in 1930, Noël Coward’s Private Lives is a situation comedy of manners providing four (and a half) sparkling character sketches crafted by the only man in the entire history of English slang to whom the term ‘wicked’ can be applied in every sense of the word. Mark Duncan, director of the 2014 Royal Lyceum Theatre Company’s production, is tasked with balancing the script’s period topicality as well as its universality. His twin supports are a hugely ambitious set and a focused team of character actors.

We enter to find that a hybrid of Benidorm and Burgh Island has landed in Edinburgh’s West End. A hotel tower block rises from the stage at an angle to make us in the cheap seats feel slightly queazy. The focus is on a balcony divided between two apartments. The success of this design is that it concentrates the tragi-comedy into a relatively small space. It’s a tight canvas on to which John Hopkins as Elyot Chase, and Emily Woodward as his new wife Sybil are the first to step.

Hopkins perfectly captures the essence of Elyot’s laconic detachment from life, triple refining his portrayal through layers of insecurity, malice and childish bewilderment. He mixes a jerky suavity with an uncontrolled natural passion. The result is a volatile cocktail which, as will become clear, no woman can fully fathom.

Woodward places Sybil between a rock and a nutcase. On the one hand her character is inexorably drawn to Elyot’s strength of character, on the other her subtle charms can hardly penetrate his granite outer surface. The script affords Woodward little space to leave her mark in the first act. What there is she artfully fills out with breadcrumbs pointing the way to later developments.

From the few biographies of Coward I have read, Sheridan Morley’s being the most unequalled, it’s pretty clear that if the great man took a dislike to you, you’d know about it pretty quickly. I don’t think Coward liked Victor Prynne. In fact I think he loathed every aspect that went into the first girl’s, Amanda’s, second husband.

Victor is priggish, stuffy, over-confident and underwhelming – the worst example of what an antipodean social commentator might aptly term ‘a whinging pommy bastard.’ Ben Deery steers this straw man expertly, so as to catch every lash from Amanda’s tongue, everyone of Elyot’s barbs and the full force of Sybil’s irre. Still, we are left feeling more sorry for the inanimate wreckage of Amanda and Elyot’s quarreling than for Victor – just as it should be.

Kirsty Besterman completes the foursome with an uncompromising vision of Amanda. Amanda likes to get sunburnt, knowing that after the pain and discomfort will come the perfect tan. She likes to play with fire in other ways and expects to get burnt. Besterman doesn’t have the spring of one-liners Coward bestowed on Elyot from which to draw strength. Instead she discovers the inner-source of Amanda’s power to fascinate and infuriate, measuring it out with a spontaneous grace both beguiling and bewitching.

All four actors do an excellent job of amplifying their characters’ traits. As with the rest of the Coward cannon, the writing is subtle but not deep. We don’t know why these people behave as they do. They are not run through a gauntlet of reprisals for their actions and behaviour. We must take them as we see them. As with the other great comic writer of his age, Wodehouse, Coward is not presenting critical social analysis. This is entertainment not moral philosophy.

To judge a classical rendition of Private Lives is to determine whether Duncan has achieved the balance between topicality and universality.

The topicality is emphasised through period pieces in the lighting, sound, set and properties. In the main these are all highly accomplished. However, unlike the set for Act 1, the hotel balconies, that for Acts 2 and 3, Amanda’s Parisian bolthole, failures to condense the drama. Somewhat artificially, the two couples are compelled to share an under-sized chaise lounge in the massive living area of her pied-à-terre. I can’t see the entrances to stage right, and much of the decor is lost upstage. The set is certainly impressive and impressively dressed but does it do the business? Not really.

None-the-less the universality of couples falling in and out of love is there. So too is the pretence and passion of romance. This production is highly quaffable, bubbly and intoxicating. It’s not vintage stuff but it’s as near as makes no odds.

nae bad_blue

Reviewer: Dan Lentell (Seen 18 February)

Visit Private Lives’ homepage here.

Arcadia (Bedlam: 5-8 Feb.’14)

Arcadia apple   Arcadia2

the counterpoint of rhetoric as chat-show”

Editorial Rating: Nae Bad

Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia (1993) still has time on its side. There are two apples on the table, the original that Gus offers Hannah at the end of scene two and now there’s Valentine’s MacBook.  Whether ‘Pro’ or ‘Air’ I don’t know but – for a while – let’s stay with ‘Pro’ because this is a student production with professional heft.

The principal roles carry with admirable ease; big ideas don’t sound too heavy; and the impression grows of well-rehearsed supportive work, for even the closing waltzers look to be in step.

Anyway, you don’t ‘do’ Arcadia lightly. This is a recognised heavyweight of modern British drama. Go to The New Yorker online for ‘Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia, at Twenty’ and see what I mean. The plot need not be reviewed – ‘I can’t do plots and have no interest in plots’, said Stoppard when interviewed for the Paris Review in 1988. OK, a soundbite and before Arcadia, but he makes it clear that he does not like ‘narrative mechanics’. What matters is structure (most difficult) and dialogue (easiest). He looks forward to writing ‘a literature play rather than an event play…. in one setting …. where all the time and the energy can be devoted to language, thought process, and emotion’. Eh voilà, a few years later, Arcadia, where Thomasina (13 and brilliant) picks up the leaf of the apple and says “We will start with something simple. I will plot this leaf and deduce its equation”. Note restricted use of ‘plot’. That, as it happens, leads to iterated algorithms of grouse numbers on the MacBook in Act 2 but Arcadia, for all its astonishing architecture, breadth and ingenuity, is a stage play and not a spreadsheet.

A pertinent example:
Bernard:     Because time is reversed. Tock, Tick goes the universe and then recovers itself, but it was enough, you were in there and you bloody know!
Valentine:   Are you talking about Lord Byron the poet?
Bernard:     No, you fucking idiot, we’re talking about Lord Byron the chartered accountant.
Valentine:   (Unoffended) Oh well, he was here all right, the poet.

Not that directors Eric Geistfeld & Charlotte Hodge have much room to enjoy this. The Bedlam stage has to be extended to accommodate the large table at its centre. Additional seating is provided onstage, left and right, but is unhelpful. Stoppard’s own description is of a bare room, uncarpeted, where ‘nothing is impressive but the scale’. Shooting parties are heard as noises-off and the schoolroom table accumulates the right props: folders, books, paper, pen, ink, an aged tortoise called ‘Lightening’ doubling as a paperweight. In the last scene, importantly, there is a pot of dwarf dahlias but otherwise the very large country house in Derbyshire in 1809, a stately home in 2014, is a distant setting in Bristo Place.

Upfront, down stage and around the table, however, there is solid, focused performance. Lauren Moreau is Thomasina Coverly and is entirely convincing as genius pupil and smart child (think Outnumbered Karen), who is as fascinated by jam in her rice pudding as she is by kissing. Pedro Leandro is her tutor, Septimus Hodge, who does languid and attractive intelligence to the nth degree of Fermat’s last theorem. Stoppard’s George in Jumpers (1972) belongs ‘to a school which regards all sudden movements as ill-bred’. Septimus went to Harrow, maybe played in the eleven with Byron, and learnt the same lesson. Leandro voices the elegant wit of the gentleman scholar as if to the manner born. Peter Stanley as Valentine Coverly, post-grad mathematician and modern day heir to Sidley Park, has the other sort of manor but the same gift of lazy concentration. As with Septimus, Valentine’s words provide rhythmic measure and reflection and Stanley makes you listen. Rik Hart as Bernard Nightingale provides the counterpoint of rhetoric as chat-show. Almost insufferable, ‘bouncy on his feet’, an academic bloodhound, the part drives the actor and Hart controls it very well.  Sita Sharma, as Hannah, has to manage this clever, unrelenting, assault and still stand her own ground. A threatened kick in the balls and calling him an “absolute shit” gives her an encouraging, winning, start that a poised Sharma does not relinquish.

Supporting roles are better than also-rans but it is uneven going. Arcadia is an unforgiving estate in 1809. The costumes looked really good but this is not period drama and the physical comedy cramped up. Braying outrage from Henry Conklin as Chater and a glowering Capt.Brice RN. (Sebastian King) were fun but … too much. Rosie Pierce as Lady Croom went all out for pure-bred aplomb and witty hauteur, leaving Derbyshire far behind. Poor Mr Noakes (Lewis Robertson), jobbing landscape gardener, had no defence but a soft Scottish accent, which was nice. The remaining household: butler Jellaby (Will Naameh) and Lord Augustus (James Beagon) – stay impassive, dumb in my lordship’s case, and that served well.

In contemporary Sidley Park, Catherine Livesey is Chloe Coverly, 18 – giddy, kind and susceptible; whilst James Beagon is back and now speaks as ‘Gus, at Eton and pretty cool.

As students might plough a tough exam it is entirely possible to plough  Arcadia and bury it. But not this time. Directors Eric Geistfeld & Charlotte Hodge and cast should reap a reward.

nae bad_blue

Reviewer: Alan Brown (Seen 5 February)

Visit Arcadia homepage here.

The Seas of Organillo (Traverse: 4 Feb.’14)

Organillo

The Seas of Organillo is a birthing pool for puppets.”

Editorial Rating: Nae Bad

From above – and occasionally in – The Seas of Organillo master puppeteer Stephen Mottram manipulates a biosphere of his own making. In a general Wiki sense a biosphere is a closed, self-regulating system containing ecosystem(s) – ‘including artificial ones’. There you have it: a puppet show that is deeply immersed in itself as a creative process. Highfaluting? Not at all, once you’ve seen it, heard it, and come up for air.

The electro acoustic score is vital and accompanies the whole work rather like an evolutionary agent. Mottram explains its genesis after the show (and on YouTube). He brings on the organillo, a small hand-turned barrel organ, that he built himself over four months out of his old wardrobe, drain pipe, lining paper, and B & Q. Each cylinder roll provides eight minutes of music but multiple recordings of the whole clicking, bubbling, breathing, box provide the soundtrack. There is no speech. Call it organic, obviously.

There are seashore calls and off-shore waves but nothing on-shore. On the surface the seas support a couple out rowing but it is only a couple of turns around the bay before they’re gone and a swimmer comes into view. More homunculus than human, a tiny ET in a cycle helmet, really; for, says Mottram, “I liked the poetic idea of swimming creatures somewhere between fish and people”. Whatever they are, they love the sea – and each other, which is kind of the point.

The Seas of Organillo is a birthing pool for puppets. It is sex under water for little, primitive, humankind and as such it is both innocent and fascinating. You see a bubble of life-giving air rise to the (invisible) surface; hands move and stroke each other in deep space; an egg floats free. Sperm penetrates the egg and – as with a multiplying shoal, more or less – cell division begins, a womb is formed and new angelic life begins. Up top, Mum and Dad now row into sight with an infant in tow.

So much, so familiar in biological terms but the puppetry is something else. There are a lot of puppets in The Seas of Organillo and they are often moving alongside automata – “sexy machines”, Mottram calls them – to help create the liquid, holistic illusion. Occasionally I couldn’t figure it out: the triffid-octopus like ‘thing’ of a fallopian tube; the egg eating clam; the stripping-off of colourful layers from around the fertilised egg – but then, after the show, I read the helpful hand-out that I should have read before I went under.

I’m a pretty poor hand at keeping fish. They survive but without much support. In The Seas of Organillo, first conceived  around 1998-2000,  Stephen Mottram has made puppets akin to biotechnology. Probably a first.

 

nae bad_blue

Reviewer: Alan Brown (Seen 4 February)

Visit Stephen Mottram’s  homepage here.

Long Day’s Journey into Night (Lyceum : 17 Jan. – 8 Feb.’14)

Production photos for "Long Days Journey Into Night"

‘‘Health and happiness ’ and then, perfectly, ‘that’s a joke’.’

Editorial Rating: Nae Bad

By now Long Day’s Journey into Night has a lot of followers. Written in 1941 this is Eugene O’Neill’s Facebook page from hell – and back – and without any privacy settings. Received by the New York Times in 1956 as a ‘saga of the damned …. like a Dostoevsky novel in which Strindberg had written the narrative’ it is a remarkable and important play. Watch it (occasionally not easy), follow its story (not difficult) and you’ll realise, in epic Facebook terms, its ‘social utility’ for our time.

You will like the kind and sympathetic realization of character in this Lyceum production. Diana Kent, who plays Mary Tyrone, says “There’s no baddie in the play. Everybody is flawed, everybody damages everybody else, but there’s a reason for it, and everybody can be forgiven. It’s a hugely compassionate play” (HeraldScotland, 5 January). For director Tony Cownie it’s ‘a very personal family situation [turned] into a very meaningful intense drama’ (Lyceum programme). Guilt and retribution – the acid feed of some productions – come a discordant second to underscored themes of conflicted love and understanding. A word here for the dialect coaching of Lynn Bains, for the accents are never strained, however keenly pitched. Cue also sorrowful cello, piano, and a quiet sea  – off-stage right  – rather than screaming strings and raucous gulls.

Paul Shelley is James Tyrone, handsomely retired actor, who at sixty-five would still command the stage or living room with debonair gesture and manner. Seduced by $35000 a year net profit at the box office he gave up on Othello and Shakespeare for the lead in melodramas. He shows off his cigars but does not smoke them and the theatrical metaphor is never far away. ‘The final curtain will be in the poor house’ he declaims but whilst he can guard his whiskey (he’s an Irish American remember) and wryly attack the fecklessness of his sons he is again losing his wife to her morphine habit. Shelley shows the pronounced make-up of a man whose dignity and loyalties are keeping him together but are wearing him out at the same time.

Tyrone often holds his wife of thirty-six years but Mary is not really there. He might as well embrace the air for Diana Kent plays Mary as a woman in love with a happy, momentary, past. Her speech is limpid clear and sounds as lonely as she feels. Even when animated and with their vivacious young housekeeper, Cathleen (Nicola Roy), Mary is receding. Her addiction will reclaim her, is reaching her all the while, as inescapable and as all-enveloping as the sea fog that O’Neill would fold her in.  A muted foghorn signals the same. Kent’s performance is one to admire and to think about.

The two Tyrone ‘boys’, James Jnr (33) and Edmund (23), do love their parents and it is naturally selfless, unlike what came next in O’Neill’s A Moon for the Misbegotten (1947). Adam Best as James Jnr. and Timothy Evers as Edmund are very well matched. Their open exchanges provide a sure solidity and warmth that shore up the fragile state of their parents’ relationship. Granted they do drink a lot of whiskey but that allows Edmund, of all people, to propose ‘Health and happiness’ and then, perfectly, ‘that’s a joke’.

However, as is the case here, cut over an hour from O’Neill’s script and put too much distance between the Tyrones and the play’s autobiographical anguish, then you might, cheekily, unfairly, plot this Journey to a few miles out of Elie or maybe Troon. The Tyrone’s car might be a Lexus (actually it’s a Packard) but it looks cheap compared to their neighbour’s S class Mercedes. James Tyrone routinely buys to let and is cash poor; he worries about his electricity bill. He expects his sons to make money. He’s meanly content with the state hospital rather than pay out for private healthcare. Mary wants a proper upholstered home, preferably in the city. The men change into dapper suits to go to town. The full-on wooden wall of the ‘cottage’ interior looks like the neat cladding of apartments in Edinburgh’s Quartermile. There is, I think, a bourgeois milieu here that is pretty comfortable and spacious, some way off O’Neill’s cabined and pathological closeness, and that has to limit the tragedy of a family on the rocks.

Is it helpful to salvage significant pity and modest understanding from the fuller, near mythical qualities of this great American drama? Yes. This is a good, clear-sighted, production of Long Day’s Journey into Night that stops well short of the gloaming.

nae bad_blue

Reviewer: Alan Brown (Seen 21 January)

Visit Long Day’s Journey Into Night homepage here.

‘Peter Pan’ (King’s Theatre: 30 Nov ’13 – 19 Jan ’14)

PP_masthead

“On deck aboard the Jolly Roger, pint-sized John Darling, with obligatory top hat and brolly, upstages the big, very tall, Captain Hook (Grant Stott) with talk of human rights and the Geneva Convention”

Editorial Rating: Nae Bad 

Hook up with Peter Pan and you’re way beyond parental guidance. There is, of course, no ‘PG’ certificate attached to this ‘swashbuckling pantomime adventure’ that splashes music, dance, colour and broad comedy over young and old alike. J.M Barrie is in small print but never mind for within moments of Mrs Smee’s (Dame Allan Stewart) balloon landing she is squirting water from her eye-catching boobs and foolish, lovable, Mr Smee (Andy Gray) is off on a plump pantaloon’s dream ticket, riffing on ‘balloooon’ until his lugubrious jowls fold in helpless laughter.

The show fits its Christmas billing. The outsize programme features ‘Panto Puzzlers’ – try Michael’s Star Maze for example – and happy seasonal advertising for the young at heart. ‘If you can dream it, you can do it’ is a good enough way to Never Never Land (not Musselburgh) …  via the second star to the right. There is lots of fairy dust and spectacular lighting to fly us out of Edinburgh and to transform the ‘wee green bogey man’ into the fearless, battling, Peter who will not grow up.

On deck aboard the Jolly Roger, pint-sized John Darling, with obligatory top hat and brolly, upstages the big, very tall, Captain Hook (Grant Stott) with talk of human rights and the Geneva Convention. Poor preening, impotent Hook! There is snide mention of his little blue pills – Tiger Lily gets leered at – and his quarter-deck shakes a bit as he clashes swords with the agile Peter. His (over-used) command of ‘Pirates Attack’ brings on a nice dance trio who would not attack a sand-castle. Regardless, Stott preps for his dastardly role by a brief appearance as Mr Darling, twirling his moustache and singing a wicked little ‘It’s a banker’s life for me’. The later mention of Fred Goodwin is happily inevitable.

The really funny routines are firmly with the Smees. Allan Stewart and Andy Gray perform with gleeful, twittish and tickling spirit as sparring couple, squashed couple and as a pair of beached mermaids. One scene, involving mops on parade and the baldy joke, is too long but the two become real pantomime villains when with the lights up they turn a tv.camera on the audience. Grown-ups beware!

“But where”, the cry should go up, “is Peter?” Well, he is not quite as lost as his Lost Boys, but he is nowhere near Wendy either, which makes Maggie Lynne’s part sweet but distant. Daniel Healy flies in well – one leg perfectly bent at the knee – but it is not easy to land lines like ‘To die would be an adventure’ amidst the fire balls and dance numbers, not to mention an interloping 007 and Adele. Peter’s rousing ‘Cock a doodle doo’ greetings cannot stand against the fun to be had with sing-along ‘Rum tum tickle your bum, Everyone one shout hurrah!’ or a barfing, “HiYa”, Tinkerbell.

And give the animals their place in this entertaining show: one large Nana dog, all big eyes and paws; Hook’s smart-alec parrot; and the mother of all crocs. You do want to see that croc!

nae bad_blue

Reviewer: Alan Brown (Seen 17 December)

Visit Peter Pan homepage here.

‘Amanda’ (The Kilderkin: 28 Nov ’13)

“Actor Anne Kane Howie makes a nicely detached Amanda, far from emotionless yet tightly controlled, the perfect match for her ambiguous role”

Editorial Rating: Nae Bad 

Part of November’s “Theatre Uncut” season, the one-off short play Amanda lends an important global political issue a distinctively Scottish spin.  From a Holyrood office to a New Town retreat, we follow one woman’s progress through a perfectly ordinary day; a day that involves both struggle and compromise, sometimes with voices from her own past.

Wisely, given its twenty-minute duration, the story’s confined to a single scene and a single character – the titular Amanda.  In the company of two narrators, we visit Amanda in a moment of quiet introspection, alone in the bathroom of her Georgian flat.  Building such a short piece around such a low-key premise is a mature decision from playwright Kieran Hurley, but perhaps it’s a little too luxuriant; when all’s said and done, the piece develops slowly and ends with little territory explored.

Hurley does, however, deliver an elegantly subtle turnaround.  At first, it seems we’re expected to dislike Amanda (rather unfairly, since her only obvious crimes are to sprinkle her bath with rose petals and enjoy the sound of posh voices on Radio 4).  But later, we learn she’s a more complex character than she first appears; and perhaps, the script seems to suggest, our reactions to her need to be complex ones too.

Actor Anne Kane Howie makes a nicely detached Amanda, far from emotionless yet tightly controlled, the perfect match for her ambiguous role.  Nick Cheales and Yvonne Paterson perform well as the dual narrators; they’re unobtrusive without being inconspicuous, and their deft handling of the props required to create Amanda’s bathroom speaks of meticulous rehearsal.

As always, director Andy Corelli works in some charmingly quirky motifs – right up to the curtain-call, where he remembers something I’d completely forgotten, that Amanda needs to step out of the bath.  He also makes good use of the improvised space at the Kilderkin, proving that rooms behind a pub don’t have to be the exclusive preserve of stand-up comedy.  There’s an incongruity to the setting that can’t quite be denied, but some clever scene-setting and an opportunistic use of the Christmas lights successfully evoke the essence of the elegant New Town.

Overall, the odd thing about Amanda is that it’s not an activist piece – or even an especially political one.  You might choose to think that the title character has sold out her principles; but you might think she’s simply grown wiser as she’s grown up.  The script presents some facts about her life yet your interpretation of those truths comes entirely from within.  So is that an abdication of the playwright’s duty, or a valuable spark for debate?  On that question also, you’ll have to make up your own mind.

nae bad_blue

Reviewer: Richard Stamp (Seen 28 November)

‘White Christmas’ (Festival Theatre: 19 Nov ’13 – 4 Jan ’14)

White Chtistmas

“Steven Houghton and Paul Robinson as Bob and Phil capture the essential bromance shared by their characters. Their banter is spontaneous and like any good couple, they are fun to be around.”

Editorial Rating: Nae Bad

My companion finds me in Captain’s on South College Street. The outside world can bustle about all it wants in the brisk mid-winter air, in here is a cocoon of tranquillity. Looking up I see that someone has managed to deposit a Christmas-themed fruit machine on the stool next to mine. It has several strips of flashing LEDs whizzing around a scene depicting reindeer having a snowball fight while a large man, dressed in red, taps an impatient foot beside a huge roasted bird. “They can’t be making fruit machines out of wool,” I think, and they aren’t. It’s my companion fishing for a compliment on her Christmas jumper and red santa hat. I’m starting to understand just how excited she is about seeing Irving Berlin’s White Christmas: The Musical round the corner at the Festival Theatre. Secretly, I am too.

We enter the dress circle to the harmoniously discordant sound of the orchestra warming up. It brings on a tingle of anticipation, like the smell of like gently mulling cider. Their conductor is rising star, Andrew Corcoran. In the decade since he graduated, Corcoran has been involved with many of the best loved shows in the West End and beyond. Corcoran and his big band knock out the auld favourites at just the right tempo to hold things together while things move along swiftly. It’s going to matter that the music is kept pacey in this production.

Since leaving the US Army, Bob Wallace and Phil Davis have made it big. When the song and dance team are not delighting audiences of The Ed Sullivan Show, they are double dating two sisters in the same line. When a planned winter wonderland-style spectacular in Vermont is put on ice for want of snow, the duo determine to save the day for the sake of their former commanding general whose inn is imperilled by the lack of paying punters.

Steven Houghton and Paul Robinson as Bob and Phil capture the essential bromance shared by their characters. Their banter is spontaneous and like any good couple, they are fun to be around. Graham Cole, as General Waverly, is billed as one of the recognisable men in uniform on UK TV from his 25 years as PC Tony Stamp on The Bill. Cole was a particular favourite of my Aunty Elsie and I would have loved to have told her just how great he was.

Cole delivers a brilliantly rounded, emotive performance. He has a balancing act to perform, eliciting sympathy for a chap down on his luck whilst never letting us forget that his character once stood at the head of hundreds of fighting men. For the plot to make sense, the audience must comprehend the depth of Bob and Phil’s hero-worship for their former commander and why they are going at to such lengths to help him out. Cole’s appearance in the prologue, so much like George C. Scott at the start of Paton, made me want to see him slap one of the lads for cowardice in the face of the orchestra or fire a pair of pearl handled pistols into a low flying chorus line – Wendi Peters as the laconic Martha Watson might have been game.

Cole heads a lively company delivering a high standard of character work, Phil Cole as Ezekiel all but stole the show. Producers need to find a vehicle for Cole and Peters, the script gave only a taste of what they can achieve together. They are supported by a clever, downright witty, set design courtesy of the Tony-nominated Anna Louizos. The train scene is compact but expansive. The barn is expansive but intimate. The dressing rooms are just plain compact.

The problem was that the scenery had been fitted badly onto the large Festival Theatre stage. We were looking down into a lot of unused blank space. The stage floor was even more drably coloured than the dull orange pastells of the auditorium. The theatre’s interior, beyond the smashing glass front, has a rather calvinist approach to opulence. The impression is similar to that achieved in the better sort of Tex Mex outlet. When the men appeared in desperately dull suits of forest and olives greens I wondered if they would take an order for seafood enchiladas.

If the Santa on my companion’s jumper was ever minded to rename his team of reindeer after the essential elements of music theatre, he’d call them dance, music, set design, acting and script. The last of these would be the one in front with the red nose guiding the rest.

White Christmas is a fluffy, jolly script – a very funny script – but one which touches on deeper themes and meanings. It’s about America’s greatest generation growing old. Michael Curtiz was no less able to film a script capturing contemporary concerns in the 1954 movie than he had done with Everyone Goes to Rick’s twelve years earlier. In this production of White Christmas, the script’s tradgi-comic insight has been lost along the way.

Strong performances carried this production a long way but it still had far to go in fully releasing the magic from a script set at the most wonderful time of the year.

nae bad_blue

Reviewer: Dan Lentell (Seen 17 December)

Visit White Christmas homepage here.

‘The Mystery of Edwin Drood’ (Pleasance Theatre: 19-23 Nov ’13)

DSC_0242 (1)

“The songs are catchy, the dialogue’s sharp, and there’s a delightful knowingness to the banter with the audience”

Editorial Rating: Nae Bad 

Who killed Edwin Drood?  Many have wondered – but nobody quite knows, since Charles Dickens’ untimely death left his novel tantalisingly poised before the story’s dénouement.  This high-energy, high-risk production addresses the problem in twenty-first century style, by asking the audience to cast their votes on just who the miscreant should be.  Oh yes!  And by doing the whole thing as a musical.

It sounds an odd proposition, but by the time the curtain falls, it’s clear why Rupert Holmes’ innovative production was acclaimed on its debut in 1985. The songs are catchy, the dialogue’s sharp, and there’s a delightful knowingness to the banter with the audience.  And this student version from the Edinburgh University Savoy Opera Group retains the sense of daring which must have defined this first-ever interactive musical, with a vibe of joyful chaos and the cast electioneering amidst the crowd.

Before the vote can happen, though, there’s a whole load of Dickens to cavort through.  Actor Campbell Keith bears much of the responsibility for driving the plot, and duly gives it both barrels as the villainous Mr Jasper; if you enjoy his powerful early solo number, just wait till you see him dance. Rosa Bud, the target of Jasper’s lecherous affections, is beautifully portrayed by Alexandra Pittock, whose fine singing voice eloquently captures Rosa’s mix of chaste purity and independent spark.  Other stand-outs among the large cast include Ari L’Hevender as a big-hearted lady of ill repute, and Giselle Yonance, who gives a nuanced performance in the title role.

Holmes’ Tony-award-winning book pictures Edwin Drood performed in a late-Victorian music hall – complete with bickering divas, ill-disciplined clowns and a bombastic MC.  It’s a set-up that licenses some glorious over-acting, and EUSOG embrace that liberty with gusto; Austin Nuckols’ Reverend Crisparkle grows especially hilarious as time wears on.

The humour tends to broad parody – ranging from cor-blimey stereotype accents to a long-running lampoon of the entire musical form – and the treatment of a few key scenes might benefit from more light and shade.  In particular, the choir-master’s advances on his pupil Rosa deserve to be more stomach-churning, given the sad procession of stories of real-life abuse which has emerged over the past few years.  It must also be said that there were quite a few genuine bloopers mixed in among the accidental-on-purpose ones, though all were saved with engaging good humour by a supportive and adaptive cast.

So this isn’t the subtlest or most polished of work, but it’s big, it’s daring and it’s a whole load of fun.  What’s more, at a flab-free two-hours-forty, it’s great value too.  It is, in short, exactly what a student musical ought to be; see it if you can.

nae bad_blue

Reviewer: Richard Stamp (Seen 20 November)

Visit The Mystery of Edwin Drood homepage here.